Peninsular vs Sabah & Sarawak

Why Peninsular Malaysian is more sensitive to their race and religions when the Sabah and Sarawakians are not?

In today NST 30.07.2009 -page 19 article by Ahmad Shafiee Yaman mentioned people of Sarawak has high tolerance, respect and understanding for others' religion, belief system and race.

I personally observed this situation at Sabah and Sarawak. Also discussed this matter with some of my friends and students from sabah and sarawak they shared the same opinion. If this statement happen to be the truth then why this is not happening at peninsular Malaysia? Why people at peninsular are more recist? refuse to accept others?

In my opinion the reason being is :

The peninsular people i.e the UMNO government feels they are dominant or superior. This idea or concept has been natured in the mind and hearth of Peninsular Malaysian. This superiorty disorder by UMNO had created problem with Malays, Chinese and Indian friends at peninsular.

So because they feel superior they have no tolerance, no respect and no impartiality in their law, policy and government approach.

Compare this with Sabah and Sarawak people. They feel no different between them..... non of them are neither superior nor inferior.

The sad part is this disorder party is going to sabah and sarawak poisoning the people of sabah and sarawak as well. The moment Mahathir open up UMNO's Branch in Sabah, people of Sabah started to faith among themselves. Today The Majis Raja-Raja or the Malay Rulers are going to have their meeting at Sarawak. What is that to do with this Malay Rulers with Sarawak?

Ari - Make a difference

MACC's Ethich of conduct?

As usual we doubt the government. MACC is an independent body or the body which takes an instruction from UMNO or BN government like Malaysian Police force?

Why MACC is so serious about the allegation on misuse of the state allocation for the assemblymen for Selangor? They were not so serious when allegation were made on BN members? Khir Toyo is living happily in his RM 24 Million house and many complaine had made but no proper investigation was reported on his lifestyle, indeed the Inland Revenue Department also not doing much...

Mr Teoh Bong Hock, the political alde to DAP Seri Kembangan assemblymen Ean Yong Hian Wah was found sprawled on the roof of the fifith floor of Plaza Masalam. Why this happened to him?

Mr Bong Hock was called by MACC at 5pm. Why at 5pm? and he was interrogation from 5pm to 3.45pm? He was found dead at 1.30pm on next day in which he suppose to register is wedding.

Our question is Why MACC conducted the interrogation until late morning? Was it part of their professionalism or Duty? what ever is the reason the fundamental question is we was not the prime suspect and is that ethical for the officers to interrogate until late night? objectively speaking it is unethical to do so although the duty allow them to do it.

So, MACC's unethical conduct somehow has contributed the death of Mr Teoh Bong Hock. MACC may have acted legally but they have crossed the ethical code which is supreme to law. Therefore MACC has contribute to the death of the Innocent person and they liable.